5 Easy Facts About 223 h335 load data Described

5 Easy Facts About 223 h335 load data Described

Blog Article

I begun taking pictures Pdogs with tac. Shot fantastic and all that things. The following yr, I could not obtain any so I checked the burn charts and Here's H335. Experimented with it and got the very same speed with the very same powder demand of tac.

Swift gives the Scirocco II plus a-Frame with two distinctly differing kinds of functionality, while Sierra and Speer provide much more common cup-and-core guide tipped bullets that are suitable for the distances that almost all of massive match is shot.

All I'm concerned with is safety, I don't need to blow up the rifle or induce unnecessary don from abnormal pressures. I'll admit I nonetheless Really don't absolutely get how the same cost in equally scenarios leads to distinctive pressures, Specifically after resizing and trimming but I'm fully new to this.

I weigh Look at on the size, one out of each 10 I cost with powder by dumping the charge out during the pan, confirming the charge fat after which you can putting the powder back in the case.

I've shot lots of WC844 (military services similar to H335) and WC846 (armed service W748 or BallC2) and have not had the slightest trace of ignition issues.   Poodleshooter

Add to quotation Only demonstrate this consumer #4 · Sep 8, 2016 Here is a link to some DuPont archive file that displays IMR powders and involves Remington bullets. It truly is aged data. Notice that the photographs from the powder are in the previous sq. cans.

They never ever made 335. In actual fact Hodgdon hasn't designed any powder. They started off by promoting navy surplus powder, and presently have their various powders made by various organizations.

The problem is the fact that H335 may be very effectively managed because the pressures in loads is greater, not exceeding reloading manuals maximums. But In line with strain exam data all hell breaks out at too much pressure to the point that it is a lot more harmful than other powders pushed outside of reloading manual maximums.

Originally I assumed it might only be excellent for 223-sized cartridges. As I acquired more about this powder, I used to be impressed While using the wide array of cartridges it really is like minded for, from the minor 204 Ruger up for the 375 H&H! 

Beginning Loads ought to originate from posted reloading data, not from Net. Not trying to decide on you, you’ll end up getting far more exact ammo if you work them up and test them by yourself inside your rifle. It’s not difficult to find revealed  TAC load data.

Increase to quote Only demonstrate this person #8 · Nov 25, 2014 Sorry gdmoody I'm however learning,,, is the website from Hodgdon the a single I have to be thinking about is definitely the XTB data the a single I have to use to the TTSX or is there An additional check here that you choose to have been specking of

Unless you do have a pet bench relaxation load with H335 (challenging to think that) any of the above mentioned are going to be just fine with

2 grains and never exceed 3100 fps. The results posted during the manual for a longer barrel do yield bigger values, but it would appear that the value from the NATO ammunition in that barrel would generate even better values.

The write-up points out by example the mistake of using load information and facts for a single maker’s bullet on Yet another’s bullet of different development but the identical excess weight. As an apart, a identified (to not me!) issue with H335 is disclosed.